Qualify Java methods vs functions statement#734
Closed
kovan wants to merge 1 commit intoclojure:masterfrom
Closed
Conversation
Change "Can't store them or pass them as arguments" to "Can't be stored in vars or passed as arguments directly" to be more precise. Java methods can be wrapped in functions and then stored/passed, which the next bullet already notes. Fixes clojure#715
Member
|
Author is not a contributor and this appears to be AI generated |
Member
|
Also this does not take into account Clojure 1.12 changes |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes "Can't store them or pass them as arguments" to "Can't be stored in vars or passed as arguments directly" in the Learn Clojure > Functions guide.
The original phrasing was technically correct but could be read as an absolute limitation. Adding "in vars" and "directly" makes it clearer that wrapping in a function (shown in the next example) is the standard workaround.
Fixes #715